Prediction of Nicole Fossa Huergo [258th] vs Kaitlin Quevedo [266th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L L W L L L
Form
L W L W L W W W W LHead-2-Head: Huergo 0 - 0 Quevedo
| Huergo | Stats | Quevedo |
|---|---|---|
| 38% (6-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 59% (10-7) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 258 | Ranking | 266 |
| 256 | Highest Rank | 266 |
| 29 | Age | 19 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 7 |
| 58% (247-176) | Career Total W/L | 68% (88-41) |
| $2,200 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nicole Fossa Huergo vs Kaitlin Quevedo Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Huergo 0 - 0 Quevedo
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Huergo has won 38.78% of points on their second serve, while Quevedo has won 36.88%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Huergo, in recent form, has won 53.33% of their opponent's second serve points, while Quevedo has won 48.12%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.78% and 36.16% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Huergo has saved 47.35% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Quevedo has saved 47.28% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Huergo has won 62.22% of matches played (W/L 56/ 34), with Quevedo winning 67.65% (W/L 46/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Huergo has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 202/ 136), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 3/ 3). Quevedo has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 74% (W/L 26/ 9), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 54/ 28).
- Player level: In the last year, Huergo has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.35% of matches (W/L 53/ 32), where as Quevedo has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65.08% of matches (W/L 41/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Huergo has played against opponents with an average rank of 259.28 while Quevedo has played against players with an average rank of 252.9.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Huergo has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Quevedo has won 72% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Huergo has converted 44.64% of breakpoint opportunities, and Quevedo has converted 40.38% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Nicole Fossa Huergo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats 
Leyre Romero Gormaz
Player
Nicole Fossa Huergo
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raluca Georgiana Serban
Player
Nicole Fossa Huergo
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicole Fossa Huergo
Player
Mariia Tkacheva
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leolia Jeanjean
Player
Nicole Fossa Huergo
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Diletta Cherubini
Player
Nicole Fossa Huergo
76%
(
79 of
104)
1st Serve %
70%
(
69 of
99)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
107
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicole Fossa Huergo
Player
Emily Seibold
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dimitra Pavlou
Player
Nicole Fossa Huergo
60%
(
65 of
108)
1st Serve %
67%
(
69 of
103)
1
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
9
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
41%
(
44 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
103)
110
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eva Marie Voracek
Player
Nicole Fossa Huergo
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicole Fossa Huergo
Player
Anastasia Gasanova
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve %
76%
(
45 of
59)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
48%
(
21 of
44)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
51%
(
30 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(6) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Kaitlin Quevedo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Anastasia Zakharova
Player
Kaitlin Quevedo
80%
(
51 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Olivia Gadecki
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Varvara Lepchenko
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
64 of
94)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
94
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Caroline Werner
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
102)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
52 of
102)
99
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Angela Fita Boluda
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dalma Galfi
Player
Kaitlin Quevedo
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
49 of
89)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
7
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
85
Total Points Won
78
|
2-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Tena Lukas
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
92)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
15
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
46%
(
35 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-1 4-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Anna Orlando Pellicero
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Kaitlin Quevedo
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
66%
(
25 of
38)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
46%
(
18 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
46
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Huergo vs Quevedo?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Huergo Vs Quevedo is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (247/176) | Win/Loss | 68% (88/41) |
| 56% (541/425) | Sets Win/Loss | 63% (189/113) |
| 54% (4762/4103) | Games Win/Loss | 56% (1532/1214) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 379 | Aces Total | 173 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1135 | Total Double Faults | 310 |
| 1:15:24 | Average Match Time | 1:45:56 |
| 236.28 | Average Opponent Rank | 228.15 |
| 67% (13006/19270) | 1st Serve % | 66% (5636/8533) |
| 61% (7962/13006) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (3360/5636) |
| 44% (2771/6264) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1413/2897) |
| 52% (1267/2438) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (605/1230) |
| 47% (9013/19168) | Return Points Win % | 49% (4151/8459) |
| 58% (243/416) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 68% (87/128) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 46% (37/80) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (13/24) |
| 60% (76/127) | Deciding Set Win % | 70% (30/43) |
| 88% (245/216) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (78/70) |
| 12% (245/29) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (78/8) |
| 17% (178/31) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 35% (51/18) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
